Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jed Cappelli's avatar

"All of that talk does require a bit of technical finesse and honestly is a bit exclusionary at its core."

There is nothing inherently exclusionary in these conversations except in the fact that, in order to really hear the differences between different machines, sometimes it takes years and years of critical listening that many people have yet to do. It's not just listening, its listening in a very particular way to very particular aspects of the sound. This is what the core of audio engineering is about. It's very tempting for people who the lack ability to discern certain things to say that the people who do, are "obsessing" or "getting lost in details that don't matter". The exclusion happens naturally, not by design. It's like a sommelier vs. someone who casually drinks wine at dinner. The casual wine drinker might think that the sommelier is "obsessing" about the flavor, the aroma, the aftertaste, the bloom, etc... when in reality, they are just inadvertently displaying a deeper level of expertise and appreciation for wine. Converters (especially in vintage samplers) make a HUGE difference. The sound of an SP 1200 (and SP12) is absolutely recognizable compared to an MPC3000, for instance. Instantly recognizable / night and day difference. Whether one is better is completely subjective and depends on the desired outcome and style of music being produced. To your point, will a cheap bottle of wine get you drunk? Absolutely, but that doesn't mean that there are not people out there who are looking for a deeper, more nuanced experience.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?